[Pacemaker] Problem : By colocations limitation, the resource appointment of the combination does not become effective.
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
Wed Mar 10 02:38:28 UTC 2010
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
I asked next question before.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/61484
I guessed from your this answer.
When I use cib.xml of the answer of before, is the limitation that it combined a start of clnPingd
with after a node rebooted unrealizable?
Limitation of before :
> <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01"
> with-rsc="clnPingd" score="1000"/>
This limitation :
> <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01"
> with-rsc="clnPingd" score="INFINITY"/>
Is there a description method of cib.xml letting both limitation function at the same time?
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> 2010/3/9 <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> >> This is normal for constraints with scores < INFINITY.
> >> Anything < INFINITY is "preferable but not mandatory"
> >
> > Sorry....
> > The method of my question was bad.
> >
> > As of STEP9, is the setting that a resource of UMgroup01 does not start possible?
>
> Only if you change:
> <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01"
> with-rsc="clnPingd" score="1000"/>
>
> to
> <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01"
> with-rsc="clnPingd" score="INFINITY"/>
>
> >
> > I do not perform the INFINITY setting in cib.xml.
> > As of STEP9, I do not understand causes to become INIFINITY well.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >
> >
> > --- Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> >
> >> 2010/3/5 <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > We test complicated colocation appointment.
> >> >
> >> > We did resource appointment to start by limitation of colocation together.
> >> >
> >> > But, the resource that set limitation starts when the resource that we appointed does not
> >> start in a
> >> > certain procedure.
> >> >
> >> > We did the following appointment.
> >> >
> >> > <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01" with-rsc="clnPingd"
> >> score="1000"/>
> >> >
> >> > When clnPingd did not start, we met with the phenomenon that UMgroup01 started.
> >>
> >> This is normal for constraints with scores < INFINITY.
> >> Anything < INFINITY is "preferable but not mandatory"
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pacemaker mailing list
> >> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list
> > Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list