No subject


Mon Mar 29 03:57:18 EDT 2010


binaries for rh el 5... Good!
So for the future, the upcoming RHEL/CentOS 6.x will include ootb the 1.1
without clusterlabs repo possibly ?


>  Correct.
>
> http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series
>

Thanks!
After reading it, one question:
To understand what is a schema and sentences such as

   - If the existing syntax is all you need, consider *1.1* with the *
   pacemaker-1.0* schema.
   - If you want to try a new stable feature, use *1.1* with the *
   pacemaker-1.2* schema.
   - If you want to try a new experimental feature, use *1.1* with the *
   pacemaker-1.1* schema.

what do I need?
Does this correspond only to have 1.1 installed and set the "validate-with"
parameter for example to
validate-with="pacemaker-1.0"
?
And in this case I'll receive an error if tryign to set a 1.1 feature?

Sorry for going off topic wth the original thread...


> > Will it be backported in upcoming 1.0.9 (future stable update planned for
> > June)?
>
> Already done.
>
Thanks again


Gianluca

--0016e6d99c3b52f0e10489130b93
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Beekhof =
<span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:andrew at beekhof.net">andrew at beekhof.=
net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar=
gin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-=
left: 1ex;">
<div class=3D"im"><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; But that is for 1.1 branch that is not considered as &quot;stable&quot=
;...<br>
<br>
</div>No, existing functionality its very stable.<br>
Its just the new features that might have some extra corner cases<br>
we&#39;ve not seen exercised yet.<br>
<br>
Put it this way, 1.1 is what Red Hat and SUSE ship.<br></blockquote><div><b=
r>And in fact I saw it and its documentation files in rhel6 beta2... and it=
 was not so clear to me the situation... now it is...<br>From your link bel=
ow, now I see that we have also pacemaker 1.1 prebuilt binaries for rh el 5=
... Good!<br>
So for the future, the upcoming RHEL/CentOS 6.x will include ootb the 1.1 w=
ithout clusterlabs repo possibly ?<br>=C2=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"=
gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb=
(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

<div class=3D"im">
</div>Correct.<br>
<a href=3D"http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemake=
r-release-series" target=3D"_blank">http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/po=
st/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series</a><br></blockquote><div><br>Than=
ks! <br>
After reading it, one question:<br>To understand what is a schema and sente=
nces such as<br><ul><li>If the existing syntax is all you need, consider <e=
m>1.1</em> with=20
the <em>pacemaker-1.0</em> schema.</li><li>If you want to try a new stable =
feature, use <em>1.1</em> with the <em>pacemaker-1.2</em>
 schema.</li><li>If you want to try a new experimental feature, use <em>1.1=
</em> with
 the <em>pacemaker-1.1</em> schema.</li></ul>what do I need? <br>Does this =
correspond only to have 1.1 installed and set the &quot;validate-with&quot;=
 parameter for example to<br>validate-with=3D&quot;pacemaker-1.0&quot;<br>
?<br>And in this case I&#39;ll receive an error if tryign to set a 1.1 feat=
ure?<br><br>Sorry for going off topic wth the original thread...<br><br></d=
iv><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; bo=
rder-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

<div class=3D"im"><br>
&gt; Will it be backported in upcoming 1.0.9 (future stable update planned =
for<br>
&gt; June)?<br>
<br>
</div>Already done.<br></blockquote><div>Thanks again <br></div></div><br>
<br>
Gianluca

--0016e6d99c3b52f0e10489130b93--



More information about the Pacemaker mailing list