[Pacemaker] Shouldn't colocation -inf: be mandatory?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchepkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> I took the latest sources from the repository an got myself pacemaker Version: 1.0.9-6bf91e9195fe7649e174af0ba2c67dbd902d4a2b
> Just to remind what all this story began from, I want to be able to define resources that should never run on the same node.
>
> Here is the config
>
> primitive d1 ocf:pacemaker:Dummy
> primitive d2 ocf:pacemaker:Dummy
> primitive d3 ocf:pacemaker:Dummy
> colocation only-one -inf: d1 d2 d3
>
> It seems to be working almost fine, and by the way, sorry if it seems like I am never happy, I really appreciate your help, I started this crusade to cluster everything in sight and face lots of challenges on the way.
> Anyway, what is not quite right is what I described in an earlier post.
>
> Online: [ c20 c19 c21 ]
>
> Full list of resources:
>
> d1      (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started c19
> d2      (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started c21
> d3      (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started c20
>
> If I bring node c19 down:
>
> Node c19: standby
> Online: [ c20 c21 ]
>
> Full list of resources:
>
> d1      (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started c20
> d2      (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started c21
> d3      (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Stopped
>
> I never wanted for d3 to be brought down, just didn't want d1 started anywhere else.
> What configuration should I have used?

Not currently expressible I'm afraid.