[Pacemaker] Shouldn't colocation -inf: be mandatory?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
<gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchepkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 15, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Score = -inf, plus the patch, plus sequential = true (or unset).
>>> Not sure how that looks in shell syntax though.
>>>
>>
>> Which patch?
>>
>> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/033609d20c62
>> Vadym
>
> But that is for 1.1 branch that is not considered as "stable"...

No, existing functionality its very stable.
Its just the new features that might have some extra corner cases
we've not seen exercised yet.

Put it this way, 1.1 is what Red Hat and SUSE ship.

> and so not
> deployed for production use (BTW: no planned 1.2.0, at least up to Dec
> 2010??)

Correct.
http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/441442543/new-pacemaker-release-series

> Will it be backported in upcoming 1.0.9 (future stable update planned for
> June)?

Already done.