[Pacemaker] Shouldn't colocation -inf: be mandatory?

Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com
Tue Jun 15 10:08:23 EDT 2010


On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchepkov at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Score = -inf, plus the patch, plus sequential = true (or unset).
>> Not sure how that looks in shell syntax though.
>>
>>
> Which patch?
>
>
> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/033609d20c62
>
> Vadym
>
> But that is for 1.1 branch that is not considered as "stable"... and so not
deployed for production use (BTW: no planned 1.2.0, at least up to Dec
2010??)
Will it be backported in upcoming 1.0.9 (future stable update planned for
June)?

Thanks,
Gianluca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20100615/ccabb40c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list