[Pacemaker] Two node lsb:nfs failing starting second node
Rick Day
rick at daybunch.com
Fri Jul 30 14:47:21 UTC 2010
Can you tell me what tool is being used or exactly what is being checked
for? The problem is NFS is not running on node 2 when I bring it up so
if I knew what Pacemaker (nfs_monitor_0) is checking for I might be able
to solve my issue.
Thanks,
Rick
> Failed actions:
> > ? ?nfs_monitor_0 (node=SPDLFILE01, call=14, rc=5, status=complete): not install
> > ed
>
> [snip]
>
> Some tool needed to determine the state of the resource is not available.
> So we assume the worst (that it is running).
>
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 06:29 +0000, pacemaker-request at oss.clusterlabs.org
wrote:
> Send Pacemaker mailing list submissions to
> pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pacemaker-request at oss.clusterlabs.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pacemaker-owner at oss.clusterlabs.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pacemaker digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. LRM operation monitor gives unknown error (Cory Coager)
> 2. overwrite quorum decision (Bernd Schubert)
> 3. Re: overwrite quorum decision (Andrew Beekhof)
> 4. Re: LRM operation monitor gives unknown error (Andrew Beekhof)
> 5. Re: Two node lsb:nfs failing starting second node (Andrew Beekhof)
> 6. Re: [PING] ping, pingd and CIB updates, pick your poison :)
> (Andrew Beekhof)
> 7. Re: [PING] ping, pingd and CIB updates, pick your poison :)
> (Andrew Beekhof)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:56:59 -0400
> From: Cory Coager <ccoager at davisvision.com>
> To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> Subject: [Pacemaker] LRM operation monitor gives unknown error
> Message-ID:
> <22676_1280411819_4C5188AB_22676_7150_1_4C5188AB.7090903 at davisvision.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi all, first time setup here. I'm having an issue with one specific
> service, bind. The service actually starts and stops fine through
> pacemaker but for whatever reason the monitor event always gives an
> unknown error for this service on both nodes. How can I fix this?
>
> I am running Ubuntu 10.04 x64. I'm trying to cluster drbd, nagios, bind
> and apache. My setup seems to work, services stop and start fine, I can
> failover fine just have this one small problem.
>
>
> crm_mon shows:
> bind_monitor_0 (node=node2, call=55, rc=1, status=complete): unknown error
>
> logs show:
> crmd: [1398]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM operation bind_monitor_0
> (call=3, rc=1, cib-update=8, confirmed=true) unknown error
>
> config:
> node $id="2890c964-4ae7-4707-8f80-d66f682e286e" node1
> node $id="4b7f43c4-d04f-4f92-ba60-be8a3abcbcd0" node2
> primitive apache lsb:apache2
> primitive bind lsb:bind9
> primitive drbd0 ocf:heartbeat:drbd \
> params drbd_resource="nagios" ignore_deprecation="true" \
> op monitor interval="29s" role="Master" timeout="10s" \
> op monitor interval="30s" role="Slave" timeout="10s"
> primitive fs_nagios ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem \
> params fstype="ext4" directory="/mnt/nagios" device="/dev/drbd0"
> primitive nagios lsb:nagios3
> group rg_nagios fs_nagios bind apache nagios \
> meta target-role="Started"
> ms ms-drbd0 drbd0 \
> meta clone-max="2" notify="true" globally-unique="false"
> target-role="Started" is-managed="true"
> location cli-prefer-rg_nagios rg_nagios \
> rule $id="cli-prefer-rule-rg_nagios" inf: #uname eq node1
> colocation rg_nagios-on-ms-drbd0 inf: rg_nagios ms-drbd0:Master
> order ms-drbd0-before-rg_nagios inf: ms-drbd0:promote rg_nagios:start
> property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
> dc-version="1.0.8-042548a451fce8400660f6031f4da6f0223dd5dd" \
> cluster-infrastructure="Heartbeat" \
> stonith-enabled="false" \
> last-lrm-refresh="1280350700"
>
>
> ~Cory Coager
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this communication is intended
> only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. It may
> contain information that is privileged or confidential, and
> may be protected by State and/or Federal Regulations. If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of
> its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this communication in error, please return it to the sender
> immediately and delete the original message and any copy
> of it from your computer system. If you have any questions
> concerning this message, please contact the sender.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:26:40 +0200
> From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert at fastmail.fm>
> To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> Subject: [Pacemaker] overwrite quorum decision
> Message-ID: <201007292026.41116.bernd.schubert at fastmail.fm>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hello all,
>
> is there a way to overwrite the quorum policy decision, lets say to
> "no quorum with n/2 - 1 nodes" or "no quorum if no access to any other node"?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Bernd
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:19:05 +0200
> From: Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] overwrite quorum decision
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTinAkpLvaME9XvyxqGhkAJmBT4xHkyNFEhAgQNWQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Bernd Schubert
> <bernd.schubert at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > is there a way to overwrite the quorum policy decision, lets say to
> > "no quorum with n/2 - 1 nodes" or "no quorum if no access to any other node"?
>
> No.
> Quorum is defined as "n/2 + 1", if you don't have that many nodes,
> then you don't have quorum. Period.
>
> However, we do have a number of strategies for what to do when quorum is lost.
> Check out no-quorum-policy
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bernd
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:22:51 +0200
> From: Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] LRM operation monitor gives unknown error
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTikmu5PKxD1JNzOW18AfNDimfA+zG37wJgqar7F+ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Cory Coager <ccoager at davisvision.com> wrote:
> > Hi all, first time setup here. ?I'm having an issue with one specific
> > service, bind. ?The service actually starts and stops fine through pacemaker
> > but for whatever reason the monitor event always gives an unknown error for
> > this service on both nodes. ?How can I fix this?
>
> Looks like your init scripts are not LSB compliant.
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.0/html/Pacemaker_Explained/ap-lsb.html
>
> >
> > I am running Ubuntu 10.04 x64. ?I'm trying to cluster drbd, nagios, bind and
> > apache. ?My setup seems to work, services stop and start fine, I can
> > failover fine just have this one small problem.
> >
> >
> > crm_mon shows:
> > bind_monitor_0 (node=node2, call=55, rc=1, status=complete): unknown error
> >
> > logs show:
> > crmd: [1398]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM operation bind_monitor_0 (call=3,
> > rc=1, cib-update=8, confirmed=true) unknown error
> >
> > config:
> > node $id="2890c964-4ae7-4707-8f80-d66f682e286e" node1
> > node $id="4b7f43c4-d04f-4f92-ba60-be8a3abcbcd0" node2
> > primitive apache lsb:apache2
> > primitive bind lsb:bind9
> > primitive drbd0 ocf:heartbeat:drbd \
> > ? ? ? ?params drbd_resource="nagios" ignore_deprecation="true" \
> > ? ? ? ?op monitor interval="29s" role="Master" timeout="10s" \
> > ? ? ? ?op monitor interval="30s" role="Slave" timeout="10s"
> > primitive fs_nagios ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem \
> > ? ? ? ?params fstype="ext4" directory="/mnt/nagios" device="/dev/drbd0"
> > primitive nagios lsb:nagios3
> > group rg_nagios fs_nagios bind apache nagios \
> > ? ? ? ?meta target-role="Started"
> > ms ms-drbd0 drbd0 \
> > ? ? ? ?meta clone-max="2" notify="true" globally-unique="false"
> > target-role="Started" is-managed="true"
> > location cli-prefer-rg_nagios rg_nagios \
> > ? ? ? ?rule $id="cli-prefer-rule-rg_nagios" inf: #uname eq node1
> > colocation rg_nagios-on-ms-drbd0 inf: rg_nagios ms-drbd0:Master
> > order ms-drbd0-before-rg_nagios inf: ms-drbd0:promote rg_nagios:start
> > property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
> > ? ? ? ?dc-version="1.0.8-042548a451fce8400660f6031f4da6f0223dd5dd" \
> > ? ? ? ?cluster-infrastructure="Heartbeat" \
> > ? ? ? ?stonith-enabled="false" \
> > ? ? ? ?last-lrm-refresh="1280350700"
> >
> >
> > ~Cory Coager
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The information contained in this communication is intended
> > only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. It may
> > contain information that is privileged or confidential, and
> > may be protected by State and/or Federal Regulations. If
> > the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> > you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> > distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of
> > its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> > this communication in error, please return it to the sender
> > immediately and delete the original message and any copy
> > of it from your computer system. If you have any questions
> > concerning this message, please contact the sender.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs:
> > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:27:18 +0200
> From: Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Two node lsb:nfs failing starting second node
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTimmoK57umPq=W9da=iOO58hv5hgWXSbnJPBgGXg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Rick Day <rick at daybunch.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Failed actions:
> > ? ?nfs_monitor_0 (node=SPDLFILE01, call=14, rc=5, status=complete): not install
> > ed
>
> [snip]
>
> Some tool needed to determine the state of the resource is not available.
> So we assume the worst (that it is running).
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:29:11 +0200
> From: Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Cc: pacemaker at clusterlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] [PING] ping, pingd and CIB updates, pick your
> poison :)
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTinizGtevdA2PB45M8HSVABpGs22AF_Mnx5wZ43_ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Thomas Guthmann <tguthmann at iseek.com.au> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > As much as I like pacemaker I hate these ping tests which don't update the
> > CIB. After reading a lot on the mailing list I see that people are still a
> > lot confused. So can one of the main developers give an example that should
> > work like "how to check your connectivity" ? (the wiki still talk about
> > pingd for instance). I don't know if my rules are "by the rule book" :
> >
> > primitive ping ocf:pacemaker:ping \
> > ? ? ? ?params host_list="192.168.1.100" dampen="121" attempts="3"
> > debug="true" \
> > ? ? ? ?op monitor interval="10s" timeout="20s"
> >
> > location rule-connectivity DB \
> > ? ? ? ?rule $id="rule-ping" -inf: not_defined pingd or pingd number:lte 0
> >
> > My problem is that the CIB is not updated when I lost connectivity even with
> > pacemaker:ping instead of obsolete pacemaker:pingd (that I used before). I
> > upgraded from corosync/pacemaker 1.2.1/1.0.8 to the latest 1.2.5/1.0.9-11
> > but I still have the problem. Indeed, if my gateway (or a fake IP I'm using
> > for tests) is down I can see that ping is working correctly but
> > attrd_updater does _NOT_ update the CIB.
>
> How long did you wait?
>
> dampen="121" means that attrd will wait just over 2 minutes before
> updating the CIB
>
> > But if I do attrd_updated -R it
> > updates the value. Note: I used one node only to reduce the variables during
> > the tests so it's not something due to concurrency. See logs below. I can
> > provide a hb_report if necessary.
> >
> > Any ideas ? Bug or PEBKAC ?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Thomas
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Jul 28 15:36:05 db1 attrd_updater: [5133]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 1 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:36:17 db1 attrd_updater: [5150]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 1 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:36:29 db1 attrd_updater: [5165]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 1 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:36:47 db1 ping[5169]: WARNING: 192.168.1.100 is inactive: PING
> > 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.#012#012--- 192.168.1.100
> > ping statistics ---#0123 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100%
> > packet loss, time 1999ms#012, pipe 2
> > Jul 28 15:36:47 db1 attrd_updater: [5189]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 0 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:37:05 db1 ping[5196]: WARNING: 192.168.1.100 is inactive: PING
> > 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.#012#012--- 192.168.1.100
> > ping statistics ---#0123 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100%
> > packet loss, time 1999ms
> > Jul 28 15:37:05 db1 attrd_updater: [5212]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 0 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:37:23 db1 ping[5218]: WARNING: 192.168.1.100 is inactive: PING
> > 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.#012#012--- 192.168.1.100
> > ping statistics ---#0123 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100%
> > packet loss, time 1999ms
> > ...
> > .....
> > .......
> > Jul 28 15:56:01 db1 ping[7803]: WARNING: 192.168.1.100 is inactive: PING
> > 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.#012#012--- 192.168.1.100
> > ping statistics ---#0123 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100%
> > packet loss, time 1999ms
> > Jul 28 15:56:01 db1 attrd_updater: [7819]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 0 -d 121
> >
> > [root at db1:~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep nvpair.*ping
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-host_list" name="host_list"
> > value="192.168.1.100"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-dampen" name="dampen"
> > value="121"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-attempts" name="attempts"
> > value="3"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-debug" name="debug"
> > value="true"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="status-db1.xxx-pingd" name="pingd" value="1"/>
> >
> > # attrd_updater -R
> > # cibadmin -Ql | grep nvpair.*ping
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-host_list" name="host_list"
> > value="192.168.1.100"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-dampen" name="dampen"
> > value="121"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-attempts" name="attempts"
> > value="3"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-debug" name="debug"
> > value="true"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="status-db2.xxx-pingd" name="pingd" value="0"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="status-db1.xxx-pingd" name="pingd" value="0"/>
> >
> > #
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs:
> > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:29:11 +0200
> From: Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Cc: pacemaker at clusterlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] [PING] ping, pingd and CIB updates, pick your
> poison :)
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTinizGtevdA2PB45M8HSVABpGs22AF_Mnx5wZ43_ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Thomas Guthmann <tguthmann at iseek.com.au> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > As much as I like pacemaker I hate these ping tests which don't update the
> > CIB. After reading a lot on the mailing list I see that people are still a
> > lot confused. So can one of the main developers give an example that should
> > work like "how to check your connectivity" ? (the wiki still talk about
> > pingd for instance). I don't know if my rules are "by the rule book" :
> >
> > primitive ping ocf:pacemaker:ping \
> > ? ? ? ?params host_list="192.168.1.100" dampen="121" attempts="3"
> > debug="true" \
> > ? ? ? ?op monitor interval="10s" timeout="20s"
> >
> > location rule-connectivity DB \
> > ? ? ? ?rule $id="rule-ping" -inf: not_defined pingd or pingd number:lte 0
> >
> > My problem is that the CIB is not updated when I lost connectivity even with
> > pacemaker:ping instead of obsolete pacemaker:pingd (that I used before). I
> > upgraded from corosync/pacemaker 1.2.1/1.0.8 to the latest 1.2.5/1.0.9-11
> > but I still have the problem. Indeed, if my gateway (or a fake IP I'm using
> > for tests) is down I can see that ping is working correctly but
> > attrd_updater does _NOT_ update the CIB.
>
> How long did you wait?
>
> dampen="121" means that attrd will wait just over 2 minutes before
> updating the CIB
>
> > But if I do attrd_updated -R it
> > updates the value. Note: I used one node only to reduce the variables during
> > the tests so it's not something due to concurrency. See logs below. I can
> > provide a hb_report if necessary.
> >
> > Any ideas ? Bug or PEBKAC ?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Thomas
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Jul 28 15:36:05 db1 attrd_updater: [5133]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 1 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:36:17 db1 attrd_updater: [5150]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 1 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:36:29 db1 attrd_updater: [5165]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 1 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:36:47 db1 ping[5169]: WARNING: 192.168.1.100 is inactive: PING
> > 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.#012#012--- 192.168.1.100
> > ping statistics ---#0123 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100%
> > packet loss, time 1999ms#012, pipe 2
> > Jul 28 15:36:47 db1 attrd_updater: [5189]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 0 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:37:05 db1 ping[5196]: WARNING: 192.168.1.100 is inactive: PING
> > 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.#012#012--- 192.168.1.100
> > ping statistics ---#0123 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100%
> > packet loss, time 1999ms
> > Jul 28 15:37:05 db1 attrd_updater: [5212]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 0 -d 121
> > Jul 28 15:37:23 db1 ping[5218]: WARNING: 192.168.1.100 is inactive: PING
> > 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.#012#012--- 192.168.1.100
> > ping statistics ---#0123 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100%
> > packet loss, time 1999ms
> > ...
> > .....
> > .......
> > Jul 28 15:56:01 db1 ping[7803]: WARNING: 192.168.1.100 is inactive: PING
> > 192.168.1.100 (192.168.1.100) 56(84) bytes of data.#012#012--- 192.168.1.100
> > ping statistics ---#0123 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100%
> > packet loss, time 1999ms
> > Jul 28 15:56:01 db1 attrd_updater: [7819]: info: Invoked: attrd_updater -n
> > pingd -v 0 -d 121
> >
> > [root at db1:~]# cibadmin -Ql | grep nvpair.*ping
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-host_list" name="host_list"
> > value="192.168.1.100"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-dampen" name="dampen"
> > value="121"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-attempts" name="attempts"
> > value="3"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-debug" name="debug"
> > value="true"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="status-db1.xxx-pingd" name="pingd" value="1"/>
> >
> > # attrd_updater -R
> > # cibadmin -Ql | grep nvpair.*ping
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-host_list" name="host_list"
> > value="192.168.1.100"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-dampen" name="dampen"
> > value="121"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-attempts" name="attempts"
> > value="3"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="ping-instance_attributes-debug" name="debug"
> > value="true"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="status-db2.xxx-pingd" name="pingd" value="0"/>
> > ? ? ? ? ?<nvpair id="status-db1.xxx-pingd" name="pingd" value="0"/>
> >
> > #
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs:
> > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
>
> End of Pacemaker Digest, Vol 32, Issue 56
> *****************************************
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list