[Pacemaker] [GUI][PATCH]An orphan resource was displayed by GUI.
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
Wed Feb 24 00:48:38 UTC 2010
Hi Yan,
Thank you for a reply.
Probability of the reproduction of the problem is not high in my environment, but tries your patch for
the moment.
I e-mail a result to you.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- Yan Gao <ygao at novell.com> wrote:
> Hi Hideo,
>
> On 02/08/10 15:35, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> > Hi Yan,
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > The phenomenon of the problem does not reappear.
> > I considerably try it, but do not readily reappear.
> >
> > But, I found the interesting output from the log that the problem happened.
> >
> > When a problem happened, GUI became the following display.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > clnUMgroup01
> > clnUmResource:0
> > clnUMdummy01:0 on ['cgl60'] ocf::heartbeat:Dummy
> > clnUMdummy02:0 on ['cgl60'] ocf::heartbeat:Dummy
> > clnUmResource:1
> > clnUMdummy01:1 on ['cgl63'] ocf::heartbeat:Dummy
> > clmUMdummy02:1 on ['cgl63'] ocf::heartbeat:Dummy
> > clnUmResource:2
> > clnUMdummy01:2 not running (orphaned)
> > clnUMdummy02:2 not running (orphaned)
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Log has the output that pengine changes the name of the resource.
> > And the name is the resource name that is ORPHANED displayed in GUI.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > (snip)
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: unpack_config: Node scores: 'red' = -INFINITY,
> 'yellow' =
> > 0, 'green' = 0
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: WARN: unpack_nodes: Blind faith: not fencing unseen
> nodes
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: determine_online_status: Node cgl60 is online
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: determine_online_status: Node cgl63 is online
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: determine_online_status: Node cgl61 is online
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: find_clone: Internally renamed clnUMdummy01:0 on
> cgl61 to
> > clnUMdummy01:2 (ORPHAN)
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: find_clone: Internally renamed clnUMdummy02:0 on
> cgl61 to
> > clnUMdummy02:2 (ORPHAN)
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: determine_online_status: Node cgl62 is online
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: find_clone: Internally renamed clnUMdummy01:0 on
> cgl62 to
> > clnUMdummy01:2 (ORPHAN)
> > Jan 29 15:39:29 cgl60 pengine: [4338]: info: find_clone: Internally renamed clnUMdummy02:0 on
> cgl62 to
> > clnUMdummy02:2 (ORPHAN)
> > (snip)
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > Is there any probable cause?
> > I thought that the problem did not happen with this patch.
> >
> > I confirm that a problem appears again.
>
> If you can reproduce the problem, please try the following:
>
> --- a/mgmt/daemon/mgmt_crm.c Tue Feb 02 17:40:36 2010 +0800
> +++ b/mgmt/daemon/mgmt_crm.c Tue Feb 23 18:54:54 2010 +0800
> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@
> ret = strdup(MSG_OK);
> while (cur != NULL) {
> resource_t* rsc = (resource_t*)cur->data;
> - gboolean is_active = rsc->fns->active(rsc, FALSE);
> + gboolean is_active = rsc->fns->active(rsc, TRUE);
> if (is_not_set(rsc->flags, pe_rsc_orphan) || is_active) {
> ret = mgmt_msg_append(ret, rsc->id);
> }
>
> Regards,
> Yan
> --
> Yan Gao <ygao at novell.com>
> Software Engineer
> China Server Team, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list