[Pacemaker] fence-peer helper broken, returned 1

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:23:37AM +0100, Patrick Zwahlen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a simple active/passive Corosync/DRBD/XFS/NFS cluster (see
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.highavailability.pacemaker/4672 for
>> config details).
>>
>> I have made some more failover tests, and I see some errors in one case
>> that I would like to share.
>>
>> Initial situation:
>> Node 1 is DRBD master, XFS mounted, NFS started
>> Node 2 is DRBD slave, Pacemaker DC
>>
>> If I power off node 2, I get the following logs (filtered on
>> drbd/fencing):
>>
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: PingAck did not arrive in
>> time.
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: peer( Secondary -> Unknown )
>> conn( Connected -> NetworkFailure ) pdsk( UpToDate -> DUnknown )
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: asender terminated
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: Terminating asender thread
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: short read expecting header
>> on sock: r=-512
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: Creating new current UUID
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: Connection closed
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa kernel: block drbd0: helper command: /sbin/drbdadm
>> fence-peer minor-0
>> Feb 22 11:03:20 tnfsa crm-fence-peer.sh[11711]: invoked for nfs
>
> You'll get much better support at the list which is about
> Redhat's cman. People don't know much about the Redhat fencing
> modules here.

Isn't that a drbd script?