[Pacemaker] OCFS2 fencing regulated by Pacemaker?

[Sander van Vugt]

> With all this in mind, I haven't been able to file any bugs or make
> support requests to Novell due to not knowing exactly what is causing
> the issue. At the moment, if we leave well alone it performs well. If I
> was to have to reboot a node, I would expect the others get to be fenced
> afterwards.

This is exactly what I've seen as a consultant at three different sites.
Which actually makes the configuration a low availability instead of a
high availability solution. I've read that on old OCFS2 you could
manipulate the configuration somehow by writing to /proc/fs/ocfs2, but
all files in /proc seem to have disappeared, as is the case for the good
old o2cb file in /etc/sysconfig. 

If no one can tell me that I'm terribly overlooking something very
obvious, I'll file a bug for this.

Sander