[Pacemaker] Auto-restart service on IP shift?

[Erich Weiler]

> If you had an ordering constraint that said named clone should start
> after the ip, that would achieve what you want.
> Might result in extra restarts of the clone though.

I thought that was the way I had it configured, but it doesn't seem to 
work.  When I shut down testvm1, the IP goes to testvm2, but it doesn't 
restart BIND-clone there.  Here's my config:

node testvm1 \
         attributes standby="off"
node testvm2
node testvm3 \
         attributes standby="off"
primitive BIND lsb:named \
         op monitor interval="30s" timeout="10s"
primitive BIND-IP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
         params ip="10.1.1.79" nic="eth1" cidr_netmask="16" \
         op monitor interval="30s" timeout="10s"
primitive LDAP lsb:ldap \
         op monitor interval="40s" timeout="10s" \
         meta target-role="Started"
primitive LDAP-IP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
         params ip="10.1.1.80" nic="eth1" cidr_netmask="16" \
         op monitor interval="30s" timeout="10s"
clone BIND-clone BIND \
         meta clone-max="2" clone-node-max="1"
clone LDAP-clone LDAP \
         meta clone-max="2" clone-node-max="1"
location BIND-IP-placement-1 BIND-IP 100: testvm1
location BIND-IP-placement-2 BIND-IP 50: testvm2
location BIND-placement-1 BIND-clone 100: testvm1
location BIND-placement-2 BIND-clone 50: testvm2
location LDAP-IP-placement-1 LDAP-IP 100: testvm3
location LDAP-IP-placement-2 LDAP-IP 50: testvm2
location LDAP-placement-1 LDAP-clone 100: testvm3
location LDAP-placement-2 LDAP-clone 50: testvm2
colocation BIND-with-IP inf: BIND-IP BIND-clone
colocation LDAP-with-IP inf: LDAP-IP LDAP-clone
order BIND-after-IP inf: BIND-IP BIND-clone
order LDAP-after-IP inf: LDAP-IP LDAP-clone
property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
         dc-version="1.0.5-462f1569a43740667daf7b0f6b521742e9eb8fa7" \
         cluster-infrastructure="openais" \
         expected-quorum-votes="3" \
         stonith-enabled="false" \
         symmetric-cluster="false" \
         no-quorum-policy="ignore"

Am I missing something?

Thanks again!

-erich