[Pacemaker] Temporarely suspending monitoring

Dejan Muhamedagic dejanmm at fastmail.fm
Wed Aug 11 22:48:32 UTC 2010


Hi,

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:14:59AM +0200, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 August 2010 23:55:42 Bart Coninckx wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 August 2010 23:01:22 Vince Gabriel wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Bart Coninckx [mailto:bart.coninckx at telenet.be]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:49 AM
> > > > To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > > > Subject: [Pacemaker] Temporarely suspending monitoring
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We're using the Xen resource agents with an operation "monitor" that
> > > > repeats
> > > > every 60 seconds.
> > > > For backing up the Xen machines, we use "xm save" and "xm restore"
> > >
> > > which
> > >
> > > > takes
> > > > them offline for a short amount of time (and copies the memory
> > >
> > > contents to
> > >
> > > > a
> > > > file). Of course, when the monitor check happens right after the Xen
> > >
> > > guest
> > >
> > > > has
> > > > been taken offline, it will try and restart it, possibly before the
> > >
> > > Xen
> > >
> > > > guest
> > > > has been restored in the proper way.
> > > > Is there a way to avoid this? For instance by temporarely suspending
> > >
> > > the
> > >
> > > > monitoring?
> > >
> > > To stop monitoring:
> > >
> > > #crm resource unmanage <rsc>
> > >
> > > To start monitoring:
> > >
> > > #crm resource manage <rsc>
> > >
> > > > Thx!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > B.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> > > >
> > > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > > > Getting started:
> > >
> > > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > >
> > > > Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-
> > > > foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> > >
> > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > > Bugs:
> > > 
> > > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> > 
> > Hi, thx for the reply - I'm using Heartbeat with CRM, not really Pacemaker.
> >  I figured things wouldn't be too different between the two, but it seems
> >  they are. I've looked at the crm_resource command and "crm_resource -p
> >  is_managed" seems to do the same thing. Am I correct?
> > 
> > thx again,
> > 
> > 
> > B.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> > 
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs:
> >  http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> > 
> 
> Hmpf, in this thread Andrew Beekhof explains that stopping to manage a 
> resource does not stop monitoring:
> 
> http://readlist.com/lists/lists.linux-ha.org/linux-ha/0/2861.html
> 
> maybe I need to try the linux-ha list

There's another way to disable monitoring, by setting the
"enabled" attribute to false for the operation. It can be done
with crm_resource, but I can't recall the magic incantation.

Thanks,

Dejan

> B.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list