[Pacemaker] Temporarely suspending monitoring
Bart Coninckx
bart.coninckx at telenet.be
Wed Aug 11 21:55:42 UTC 2010
On Wednesday 11 August 2010 23:01:22 Vince Gabriel wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bart Coninckx [mailto:bart.coninckx at telenet.be]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 10:49 AM
> > To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > Subject: [Pacemaker] Temporarely suspending monitoring
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We're using the Xen resource agents with an operation "monitor" that
> > repeats
> > every 60 seconds.
> > For backing up the Xen machines, we use "xm save" and "xm restore"
>
> which
>
> > takes
> > them offline for a short amount of time (and copies the memory
>
> contents to
>
> > a
> > file). Of course, when the monitor check happens right after the Xen
>
> guest
>
> > has
> > been taken offline, it will try and restart it, possibly before the
>
> Xen
>
> > guest
> > has been restored in the proper way.
> > Is there a way to avoid this? For instance by temporarely suspending
>
> the
>
> > monitoring?
>
> To stop monitoring:
>
> #crm resource unmanage <rsc>
>
> To start monitoring:
>
> #crm resource manage <rsc>
>
> > Thx!
> >
> >
> > B.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started:
>
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>
> > Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-
> > foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs:
> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
Hi, thx for the reply - I'm using Heartbeat with CRM, not really Pacemaker. I
figured things wouldn't be too different between the two, but it seems they
are. I've looked at the crm_resource command and "crm_resource -p is_managed"
seems to do the same thing. Am I correct?
thx again,
B.
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list