[Pacemaker] [PATCH]The changing of the log level of pengine process.

[renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp]

Hi Andrew,

Thank you for comment.

It is difficult for me to illustrate by English.

This patch is a considerably special demand of our user.

Even if an STONITH resource duplicated, node and STONITH done STONITH of are that the log of the node
to do wants to output it by warning.

============
Last updated: Thu Jul 29 09:58:36 2010
Stack: openais
Current DC: srv01 - partition WITHOUT quorum
Version: 1.0.9-74392a28b7f31d7ddc86689598bd23114f58978b
2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
2 Resources configured.
============

Online: [ srv01 srv02 ]

 Resource Group: group-1
     prmDummy1  (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01
 stonith0       (stonith:external/ssh): Started srv01

For example, STONITH moves to srv02 when srv01 is done STONITH of in the case of resource placement
such as the above.

Our user wanted to change the log of this time.

However, I understand that it is a very special demand.

I wish that I get possible to appoint such a special demand with a start option of Pacemaker if
possible.

Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.


--- Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> 2010/7/29  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Our user showed a demand in a level of log output after handling of pengine.
> >
> > When STONITH is carried out, pengine wants to output log at a warning level if a repeating
> resource is
> > only an STONITH resource.
> >
> > Because plural STONITH may be started when STONITH is carried out.
> > However, it is because the importance of the problem is different from the plural start of the
> normal
> > resource.
> 
> I'm having trouble understanding the purpose of this patch...
> 
> If the only resource on a node to be fenced is a stonith resource, and
> that resource is also running on another node, then unset
> "was_processing_error"... is that right?
> 
> Why do that?
> 
> >
> > I wrote the patch which operated a was_processing_error flag to answer the demand of our user.
> >
> > This patch may be considerably special.
> > I do not think that all users need this patch.
> >
> > Please talk to me an opinion for this patch.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>