[Pacemaker] About influence of resouce-stickiness which used colocation for limitation.
Andrew Beekhof
andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Apr 27 19:06:41 UTC 2010
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>> > Done.
>> > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/f7da9d09ebd2
>
>
> It seems to move with your patch definitely.
>
> But, the following error is reflected on log.
> Does not this error have any problem?
>
> Apr 27 16:37:00 srv01 pengine: [5839]: ERROR: native_merge_weights: Applying group:internal_colocation
> Apr 27 16:37:12 srv01 pengine: [5839]: ERROR: native_merge_weights: Applying group:internal_colocation
Oh, that was some development logging I forgot to remove.
I'll backport that fix in a moment too.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamacuhi.
>
>
> --- renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> > Done.
>> > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/f7da9d09ebd2
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Hideo Yamauchi.
>>
>> --- Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Done.
>> > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/f7da9d09ebd2
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:18 AM, <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
>> > > Hi Andrew,
>> > >
>> > > Version 1.0 is necessary for us.
>> > > Please backport your revision to version 1.0.
>> > >
>> > > Best Regards,
>> > > Hideo Yamauchi.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --- renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Andrew,
>> > >>
>> > >> > Fixed in:
>> > >> > � �http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/4c775a4abc87
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks!
>> > >>
>> > >> Best Regards,
>> > >> Hideo Yamauchi.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --- Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Fixed in:
>> > >> > � �http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/4c775a4abc87
>> > >> >
>> > >> > 2010/4/22 �<renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>:
>> > >> > > Hi,
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > We tested the cluster constitution of four nodes.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > srv04 is a standby node, and others are active nodes.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > We use INIFINITY for resouce-stickiness well.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > But, there was a problem for resource placement when we set INIFINITY in
>> > resouce-stickiness.
>> > >> > > (An OVDBgroup02-1 resource did not start in an active srv01 node.)
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > There was not a problem for resource placement when we set 1000 in resouce-stickiness.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > * resource-stickiness=1000
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > [root at srv01 ~]# crm_mon -1
>> > >> > > ============
>> > >> > > Last updated: Thu Apr 22 15:34:03 2010
>> > >> > > Stack: openais
>> > >> > > Current DC: srv01 - partition with quorum
>> > >> > > Version: 1.0.8-52c101df29bd1851b2ea6dc13bbba450418d103b
>> > >> > > 4 Nodes configured, 4 expected votes
>> > >> > > 9 Resources configured.
>> > >> > > ============
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Online: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ]
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Resource Group: UMgroup01
>> > >> > > UmVIPcheck (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01
>> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-1
>> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB1 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01 ---> not problem
>> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-2
>> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB2 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv02
>> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-3
>> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB3 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv03
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnUMgroup01
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv04 ]
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnPingd
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv02 srv03 srv01 srv04 ]
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnDiskd1
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv02 srv03 srv01 srv04 ]
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnG3dummy1
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ]
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnG3dummy2
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ]
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > * resource-stickiness=INFINITY
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > [root at srv01 ~]# crm_mon -1
>> > >> > > ============
>> > >> > > Last updated: Thu Apr 22 15:23:43 2010
>> > >> > > Stack: openais
>> > >> > > Current DC: srv01 - partition with quorum
>> > >> > > Version: 1.0.8-52c101df29bd1851b2ea6dc13bbba450418d103b
>> > >> > > 4 Nodes configured, 4 expected votes
>> > >> > > 9 Resources configured.
>> > >> > > ============
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Online: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ]
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Resource Group: UMgroup01
>> > >> > > UmVIPcheck (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv01
>> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-1
>> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB1 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv04 ---> problem
>> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-2
>> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB2 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv02
>> > >> > > Resource Group: OVDBgroup02-3
>> > >> > > prmExPostgreSQLDB3 (ocf::heartbeat:Dummy): Started srv03
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnUMgroup01
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv04 ]
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnPingd
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv02 srv03 srv01 srv04 ]
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnDiskd1
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv02 srv03 srv01 srv04 ]
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnG3dummy1
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ]
>> > >> > > Clone Set: clnG3dummy2
>> > >> > > Started: [ srv01 srv02 srv03 srv04 ]
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > When we do not use colocation, this problem does not happen.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > We think that a difference of resource-stickiness influences it.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > When we put colocation and resoucre-stickiness together, will the calculation of the
>> > score
>> > >> be
>> > >> > right?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Is the movement when we set INIFINITY in resource-stickiness a bug?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > * I read the next document to examine colocation.
>> > >> > > * http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/File:Colocation_Explained_-_White.pdf
>> > >> > > * However, I was not able to understand the connection with resource-stickiness.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Best Regards,
>> > >> > > Hideo Yamauchi.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > >> > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> > >> > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> > >> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> > >>
>> > >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> > >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> > >
>> > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> > > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> > >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >
>> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list