[Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.4 (OpenAIS) or Pacemaker 1.0.5 (corosync)?
Andrew Beekhof
andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Sep 22 08:07:17 UTC 2009
For a two node cluster, either stack (openais or corosync) should be
perfectly fine.
Go with corosync since its paired with a more recent pacemaker build
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Joao Carvalho <joaocarvalho44 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planing to make HA cluster - two nodes with Debian Lenny. I've chosen
> Active/Passive config and I'm using DRBD and Xen.
> I'll use DomUs for some DB (MySQL or PostgreSQL) and Apache.
>
> What is better choice for me - should I install, Pacemaker 1.0.4 (OpenAIS)
> or Pacemaker 1.0.5 (corosync)?
>
> I'm pretty new in clustering so for the beginig I'm looking for solution
> that is proven to work.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list