[Pacemaker] Can I edit apache configuration file using pacemaker?

gilberto migliavacca gbmiglia at yahoo.it
Fri Oct 23 14:02:47 UTC 2009


Hi Dejan

so, do you think that I cannot create a resource agent that
modify the confiuration file of a tool (e.g. modjk)?
or can I create a resource agent that will edit a configuration file
and restart the service?

thanks in advance

gilberto



Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 07:25:27PM +0200, gilberto migliavacca wrote:
>   
>> Hi
>>
>> I have this problem and I'd like to know if I can solve
>> it using pacemaker
>>
>> I have 2 nodes with apache + modjk  + tomcat on both nodes,
>> moreover the modjk components point to the tomcat on both nodes
>> in this way the configuration (worker.properties) file of the modjk
>> keeps the information about the tomcat on the 2 nodes.
>>
>> something like:
>>
>> apache                   apache
>> modjk----       ----  modjk
>>               \     /
>>                 \ /
>> tomcat<-- / \--> tomcat
>> I'd like to understand if I can modify the modjk configuration
>> file (worker.properties) using some pacemaker commands
>>
>> in this way I can
>> - deactivate a node (modifying the modjk and launching a graceful
>> command to apache
>> - wait until the node finishes up all the active session
>> - apply a patch on the node
>> - restart the node
>>
>> all the steps about start/stop I understood I can do it with
>> pacemaker, my problem is about the file modification.
>>
>> Can I edit the modjk configuration  file (worker.properties)
>> using some pacemaker commands?
>>
>> thanks in advance ... sorry for this complicated question
>>     
>
> All the cluster knows is how to start, stop, and monitor a
> resource. The resource is represented and directly controlled by
> the corresponding resource agent. If you can fit whatever you
> want to do into a script and then have it do thing 1 on start and
> thing 2 on stop and that it returns a proper status when invoked
> with the monitor action (though there are also scripts which are
> stateless, take a look for example at ocf:heartbeat:Dummy), then
> you should be good to go. But note that one resource should not
> influence the status of another resource while it's running.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dejan
>
>   
>> regards
>>
>> gilberto
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list
>> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
>   





More information about the Pacemaker mailing list