[Pacemaker] Why are fatal warnings enabled by default?
Dejan Muhamedagic
dejanmm at fastmail.fm
Wed Oct 21 11:20:08 UTC 2009
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:49:36AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com> wrote:
> > Andrew, Dejan,
> >
> > For pacemaker and agents, configure defaults to --enable-fatal-warnings.
>
> So that the warnings get fixed.
Yes. This is one of the rare points were everybody agrees :)
> > AFAIR, neither of these have ever built successfully with fatal warnings
> > enabled.
>
> Only on Debian. shrug.
Last time I tried building on Debian there weren't any. But that
was quite some time ago. BTW, are Debian build patches pushed
upstream? Somehow can't remember seeing that.
Cheers,
Dejan
> Everywhere else it builds just fine.
>
> > Is there a specific reason to keep the default as it is? Is
> > this perhaps a deliberate entry barrier for packagers, so as to make
> > sure they know what they're doing? :) Or would it be possible to
> > actually fix those warnings, so the packages would compile -- *gasp* --
> > even with the configure defaults?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Florian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list
> > Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list