[Pacemaker] more package misery

[Johan Verrept]

On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 10:58 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Johan Verrept <Johan.Verrept at able.be> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 08:21 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Johan Verrept <Johan.Verrept at able.be> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > when I install the latest resource-agents, it installs
> >> > etc/ha.d/shellfuncs
> >> >
> >> > This file includes @OCF_RA_DIR@/heartbeat/.ocf-shellfuncs at the end.
> >>
> >> Not here.
> >> I see:
> >>
> >> # Now get the good stuff
> >> . /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d//heartbeat/.ocf-shellfuncs
> >
> > Yeah, sry, pasted from the source iso installed file. Was verifying if I
> > wasn't dealing with a stale file. Still wrong though.
> 
> You're using the RPMs from the opensuse build service?
> Which distro?

I build from source, following the wiki. All the packages are the tips
from yesterday (only pacemaker is 1.0.5 but that isn't relevant here).
FYI:

Cluster-Resource-Agents-de034cf1e9a1
Reusable-Cluster-Components-f8d8f7b2124a
Linux-HA-Dev-28c1aed2d5e7

The distro is non-standard. I don't see how this would be different on
OpenSuSE? Do they use untagged (or specifically tagged) versions?

I would really like to switch to this new package layout now that I am
still working on this. It will save me a lot of upgrade work later, so I
am prepared to put in a little effort now to get this stable, if this
fits with your schedule. How close are you to tagging this? I had the
impression this isn't really changing much in the repositories.
Are there tags available that I can use? I am mostly concerned about
traceability. If necessary, I can just use one of those hex revision
numbers (when it works :)).

	J.