[Pacemaker] why use ocf::linbit:drbd instead of ocf::heartbeat:drbd?

[Florian Haas]

On 2009-10-13 09:40, Johan Verrept wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:06 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com> wrote:
>>> Andrew, Dejan: as we consider the ocf:linbit:drbd RA stable as of the
>>> DRBD 8.3.4 release, is it acceptable to remove the legacy RA from the
>>> agents repository?
>> I think rather than remove it (which would break existing clusters),
>> i'd rewrite it to look for the linbit one and re-exec that.
> 
> Re-execing the linbit RA would break the cluster in less than obvious
> ways if they depend on the values of the master preference.

You are aware that _both_ the linbit and the heartbeat RA depend on the
values of the master preference? Like any other Master/Slave RA?

Cheers,
Florian


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20091013/441229f7/attachment-0004.sig>