[Pacemaker] why use ocf::linbit:drbd instead of ocf::heartbeat:drbd?

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Oct 12 08:08:13 EDT 2009


On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com> wrote:
> On 2009-10-12 09:06, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com> wrote:
>>> Andrew, Dejan: as we consider the ocf:linbit:drbd RA stable as of the
>>> DRBD 8.3.4 release, is it acceptable to remove the legacy RA from the
>>> agents repository?
>>
>> I think rather than remove it (which would break existing clusters),
>> i'd rewrite it to look for the linbit one and re-exec that.
>> If the linbit one isn't present, log an error with a URL and return
>> OCF_NOT_INSTALLED.
>
> We can do that; however we would also have to check for
> clone_overrides_hostname and return OCF_ERR_CONFIGURED even if the
> linbit RA is installed.

well the linbit RA would do that wouldn't it? no need to repeat the logic.




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list