[Pacemaker] why use ocf::linbit:drbd instead of ocf::heartbeat:drbd?

[Florian Haas]

On 2009-10-12 09:06, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Florian Haas <florian.haas at linbit.com> wrote:
>> Andrew, Dejan: as we consider the ocf:linbit:drbd RA stable as of the
>> DRBD 8.3.4 release, is it acceptable to remove the legacy RA from the
>> agents repository?
> 
> I think rather than remove it (which would break existing clusters),
> i'd rewrite it to look for the linbit one and re-exec that.
> If the linbit one isn't present, log an error with a URL and return
> OCF_NOT_INSTALLED.

We can do that; however we would also have to check for
clone_overrides_hostname and return OCF_ERR_CONFIGURED even if the
linbit RA is installed.

Cheers,
Florian


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20091012/1dda64fd/attachment.sig>