[Pacemaker] Resource capacity limit

[Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]]

On 11/06/2009 12:28 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Actually thats not the rationale behind it at all.
> I don't believe additional time would have improved the quality.
> CTS passed, regression tests passed and no-one tests until its released...
not too true - when there have been issues in the past, i used to
"test" and even deploy interim builds to avoid my cluster freaking out
:)

> At least releasing often means that we see the next set of bugs sooner.
agreed

> The main reason is that if one week out of every 4 is consumed by
> testing, and another one for waiting for the build service, then thats
> not much time to actually get any work done in between.
> 
> Thankfully the build service is out of the equation now so it takes at
> most a day to rebuild.
> But still, I think we're at the point where Pacemaker is stable enough
> that we don't need releases so often.
agreed for the core parts. but the cli might be worth updating more
often.

cheers,
raoul
-- 
____________________________________________________________________
DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc.          email.          r.bhatia at ipax.at
Technischer Leiter

IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OEG         web.          http://www.ipax.at
Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11           email.            office at ipax.at
1190 Wien                           tel.               +43 1 3670030
FN 277995t HG Wien                  fax.            +43 1 3670030 15
____________________________________________________________________