[Pacemaker] Suggestions/questions for Pacemaker

[Colin]

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Colin <colin.hch at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2) If I haven't missed something, there is no possibility to configure
>> dependencies on "any of a group"; given a configuration of "resource
>> set A has resources A1, A2, ..., An", we would like to say that
>> "resource B needs at least any n resources from group A
>> up-and-running, and it would be good if they were all up-and-running."
>> (The latter is of course already possible with an appropritate
>> advisory ordering constraint.)
>
> Nod.  http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007

Oh boy, there's even a lot of play in such a "simple" thing: This page
speaks of starting B after at least one of the As is "started", we
would prefer starting B if at least m of the As start up, but only
after trying to start all As, not as early as possible.

>> 7) The naming convention for the XML config seems more difficult than
>> necessary with the mixed use of underscores and dashes as
>> word-separators.
>
> most of the underscores were replaced by dashes with 1.0, the only
> underscores that remain were ones we couldn't change for compatibility
> reasons.

Does this also apply to "multiple-active" vs. "start_stop"?

Regards, Colin