[Pacemaker] Resource capacity limit

Yan Gao ygao at novell.com
Sun Nov 8 23:53:15 EST 2009


Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> 
> I've been thinking about this more and while this will work, I think
> we can make it better.
> 
> I'd like to see the while-block from native_color() be a function that
> is called from native_assign_node().
Okay.

> And instead of a limit-utilization option, we'd have
> placement-strategy=(default|utilization|minimal)
> 
> Default ::= what we do now
> Utilization ::= what you've implemented
> Minimal ::= what you've implemented _without_ the load balancing we
> currently do.
> 
> (Maybe the names could be improved, but hopefully you get the idea).
Great! There would be more policy options for users.

> 
> The last one is interesting because it allows us to concentrate
> services on the minimum number of required nodes (and potentially
> power some of the others down).
Right. I'll look it into.

Thanks,
  Yan

-- 
ygao at novell.com
Software Engineer
China Server Team, OPS Engineering

Novell, Inc.
Making IT Work As One™



More information about the Pacemaker mailing list