[Pacemaker] OpenAIS vs. Corosync
Steven Dake
sdake at redhat.com
Fri May 22 17:03:05 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 11:42 -0500, Karl Katzke wrote:
> > Karl,
> >
> > we are closing in on the final days of openais and corosync versions
> > 1.0.
> >
> > Regards
> > -steve
>
> So? When will we see some stable, well-documented configurations that aren't supported and tested by only one specific vendor?
>
> -K
>
>
Karl,
I assume vendors will start to pick up corosync 1.0 and openais 1.0
after its released and begin to support it then. The timeline for
openais-0.80.3 to be fully supported and widely distributed took several
years.
I wouldn't expect this big delay for Corosync since the code base is
similar. I expect the transition to Corosync will be rapid once
pacemaker is ported to it and its proven itself to be stable. If you
want to help, I recommend asking your OS vendor to support Corosync in
their products.
Regards
-steve
>
> ---
> Karl Katzke
> Systems Analyst II
> TAMU - DRGS
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list