[Pacemaker] crm_resource -C vs. crm/resource/cleanup

[Dejan Muhamedagic]

Hi,

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:53:36AM -0500, Karl Katzke wrote:
> 
> Are there any differences between crm_resource -C -r [-N] and
> the crm shell's resource/cleanup command? I know that both of
> them act on the lrmd objects, but I'm not sure if they do
> different things or what the preferred way of running things
> would be. I've been having to do a lot of cleanup recently as
> I'm configuring a cluster for the first time with pacemaker,
> and deleting objects doesn't always seem to clean up all of the
> LRM resource objects in the cib.  

Basically yes, it's just that the shell can also cleanup for all
nodes it finds in the cluster (i.e. if you don't specify a node).
So, it can save you some shell (as in bourne) scripting.

> Also, what does this message when running `crm_verify -LV` mean? 
> 
> crm_verify[13712]: 2009/05/11_10:25:35 WARN: unpack_rsc_op: Operation fs-mount-xen-lock_monitor_0 found resource fs-mount-xen-lock active on app-03 

Exactly what it says.

> That resource *should* indeed be running on app-03, and it is.
> Deleting the resource and it's ordering/colocation
> dependencies, then running the cleanup script across all nodes
> using `resource cleanup fs-mount-xen-lock` in the crm shell was
> required to get rid of those messages.  

You can run crm resource cleanup only on one node (or I
misunderstood).

Once its status is cleaned up, the CRM checks status of the
resource. Hence the message. You can ignore it.

Thanks,

Dejan

> I'm using pacemaker 1.0.3. on SLES11, distributed with the HA extension.  
> 
> Thanks, 
> -K 
> ---
> Karl Katzke
> Systems Analyst II
> TAMU - DRGS
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker