[Pacemaker] Pacemaker on OpenAIS, RRP, and link failure

[Florian Haas]

Andrew,

On 2009-05-25 18:16, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> To instead defer that task to a Pacemaker resource agent seems
>> positively disturbing.
> 
> No more disturbing than #2 and what are the recurring monitor
> operations if not a "cron" job?

It is not _much_ more disturbing than #2. But it seems to me like going
upstairs to second floor from first, in order to fix a problem in the
basement.

>>> I think the best solution is to work with upstream to get the feature
>>> working properly.
>> That I fully agree with. The question is what "working properly" means
>> in this case -- should it be capable of auto-recovery, or should it not?
> 
> Absolutely.  Its both pointless and useless if it doesn't.

OK.

Cheers,
Florian