[Pacemaker] System Health backend part

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Mark Hamzy <hamzy at us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I believe that general purpose solutions that follow standards should
> live in pacemaker.

Just returning to this for a moment, if it is a truly general purpose
solution, then it could be useful for those not running Pacemaker.

So if we're talking about a daemon, then unless its pacemaker-specific
or needs pacemaker to compile, then it really should go in with the
other resources (we'll have some announcements regarding where
resources are kept "soon").