[Pacemaker] When STONITH is not completed, a resource starts.
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
Wed Jan 14 08:59:40 UTC 2009
Hi,
> > 1)I make it the state that a resource starts in a standby node.
> > 2)I change it so that a stop error occurs in a dummy resource.
> > 3)I generate the monitor error of the dummy resource in a standby
> > node.
> > 4)After a stop error, STONITH is carried out by a partner node.
> > 5)Keep STONITH from a standby node waiting.
> > 6)While STONITH is not completed, I reboot a standby node.
>
> Is this in a two-node cluster?
Yes.
> > Though STONITH from a DC node does not succeed, a resource is started.
> > When STONITH did not succeed, the resource was not started at a non-
> > DC node.
>
> I don't understand what you're saying here.
> The first statement says a resource was started and the second says it
> wasn't... they can't both be true.
I'm sorry.
It caused misunderstanding.
It is time when STONITH is carried out in the environment of two nodes by a standby node.
A resource is started without waiting for completion of STONITH from a DC node.
While STONITH is not completed, this problem happens if an active node fell.
I confirmed the same confirmation based on OpenAIS.
However, in OpenAIS, the same problem did not occur.
In OpenAIS, the start of the resource is evaded well.
Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- Andrew Beekhof <beekhof at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > About movement of STONITH, I tested it.
> > (heartbeat 2.99.2 + Pacemaker-1-0-6fd0eebd186e.tar.gz on
> > RHEL5.2(i386VM))
> >
> > When what I confirmed carries out STONITH from a DC node and a non-
> > DC node.
> >
> > I confirmed it in the next flow.
> >
> > 1)I make it the state that a resource starts in a standby node.
> > 2)I change it so that a stop error occurs in a dummy resource.
> > 3)I generate the monitor error of the dummy resource in a standby
> > node.
> > 4)After a stop error, STONITH is carried out by a partner node.
> > 5)Keep STONITH from a standby node waiting.
> > 6)While STONITH is not completed, I reboot a standby node.
>
> Is this in a two-node cluster?
>
> > I watched log.
>
> >
> > Though STONITH from a DC node does not succeed, a resource is started.
> > When STONITH did not succeed, the resource was not started at a non-
> > DC node.
>
> I don't understand what you're saying here.
> The first statement says a resource was started and the second says it
> wasn't... they can't both be true.
>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jan 13 16:01:25 ais-1 crmd: [6003]: info: send_rsc_command:
> > Initiating action 7: start
> > prmDummy1_start_0 on ais-1
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > When STONITH did not succeed, I thought that the resource did not
> > start.
> > Does not the behavior when STONITH failed from a DC node have a
> > problem?
> >
> > I attach a result of hb_report.
> > - stonith_exec_dc.tar.gz (A result when STONITH was carried out by a
> > DC node(ais-1))
> > - stonith_exec_nodc.tar.gz(A result when STONITH was carried out by
> > a non-DC node(ais-1))
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >
> > <
> > stonith_exec_dc
> > .tar
> > .gz
> > >
> > <
> > stonith_exec_nodc
> > .tar.gz>_______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list
> > Pacemaker at clusterlabs.org
> > http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at clusterlabs.org
> http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list