[Pacemaker] no-quorum-policy
Romi Verma
romi3rdfeb at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 08:57:52 UTC 2009
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Glory Smith <xx2glory at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Romi Verma <romi3rdfeb at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have one confusion . pacemaker (configuration explained ) document
>> says that " if the cluster does not have quorum then the cluster cannot
>> start resources or fence other nodes." i understand that when
>> no-quorum-policy is set to "stop" then cluster will not be able to start
>> it's existing resources and when it is set to "freeze" cluster will not be
>> able to add and start new resources. but i dont know when it will not be
>> able to "fence other nodes" . i guess it should be when no-quorum-policy
>> is set to suicide.
>
>
> As far as i know There is no "suicide" no-quorum-policy. atleast document
> you mentioned does not talk about it . Please check it out again and keep
> me posted . Thanks
>
Suse 11 has Suicide as no-quorum-policy and you are right document does
not have information about it. i dont know the reason why. Andrew can
explain this.
Andrew: please answer to following question also . many many Thanks.
>
>
>> well if it is like this then in 2 nodes cluster, when ever split brain
>> situation will happen then a node will never be able to reset other node as
>> without quorum fencing can not happen. only suicide can happen that means a
>> node will reset itself in absence of quorum. am i right??
>>
>>
>> Please let me know your view on this.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list
>> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20090209/f3f5b394/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list