[Pacemaker] Please Help - frequent cleanup is required for the resources on failover condition

[Abhin GS]

Good Morning Dejan,

Thank you for your input, will increase the time out to 60 sec. I guess
we have switched the other machine off (pull the plug we did), the
fencing was strapped to "ilore", i guess since there was no supply to
node2, HP ilo2 did not function, so node 1 could not reach it. 

Pull the plug with ilo as the fencing method was a dump thing to do i
guess. 

So in a scenario where the node1 cannot reach the other fencing device
will break the cluster?   

extract of a mail form the group.

# On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:18:34PM -0600, hj lee wrote:
#> Hi,
#> 
#> I defined stonith:ssh, they are running in both machines as a clone.
#How is
#
#How do you expect ssh to work if you pull the power plug from the
#target node?
#
#> the stonith related to promoting standby? When the Pacemaker detects
#master
#> node was gone in cluster, then why doesn't Pacemaker promote the
#standby?
#
#In case of such an event, when a node disappears without saying
#goodbye, the other node has to make sure that the node which left
#is down and not only unreachable, that's where fencing comes in.
#
#Thanks,
#
#Dejan

I guess the answer for my question is "yes". Correct me if i am wrong.

If this is the case, for some reason, if i had to replace the node 2
when node1 is dc, could break the cluster right, coz the fencing device
will be unreachable.


Please do let me know if there were any another anomalies.


Thank You,

Warm Regards

Abhin

On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:35 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Dejan

----------
Ukazte svoje fotky na www.zonerama.sk