[Pacemaker] Pacemaker 0.7.3: How to use pingd clone resource and constraints
Bruno Voigt
Bruno.Voigt at ic3s.de
Thu Sep 25 19:33:27 UTC 2008
Wow.. these warnings are even shown for 127.0.0.1 ?!
Do I need to finetune the IP stack options somewhere like in sysctl.conf
to have these warnings of pingd fixed?
root at xen20b:~# /usr/lib/heartbeat/pingd -V -a pingd-internal -d 5s -m
1000 -h 127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:04 debug: main: Adding ping host 127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:04 debug: main: attrd registration attempt: 0
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:09 debug:
init_client_ipc_comms_nodispatch: Attempting to talk on:
/var/run/heartbeat/crm/attrd
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:09 info: main: Starting pingd
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:19 debug: stand_alone_ping: Checking
connectivity
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:19 debug: ping_open: Got address
127.0.0.1 for 127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:19 debug: ping_open: Opened connection to
127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:19 debug: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to
127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:19 WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo (0): 8,
code=0, seq=5, id=0, check=22763
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:20 debug: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to
127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:20 debug: dump_v4_echo: 59 bytes from
127.0.0.1, icmp_seq=5: beekhof-v4
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:21 debug: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to
127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:21 WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo (0): 8,
code=0, seq=13138, id=0, check=3000
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:22 debug: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to
127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:22 debug: dump_v4_echo: 59 bytes from
10.10.10.167, icmp_seq=13138: beekhof-v4
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:23 debug: ping_write: Sent 39 bytes to
127.0.0.1
pingd[26741]: 2008/09/25_21:30:23 WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo (0): 8,
code=0, seq=8284, id=0, check=459
root at xen20b:~# uname -a
Linux xen20b.bb.ic3s.de 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 19 06:15:09
UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Bruno Voigt wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> is pingd doing alive tests differently compared to the normal ping command?
> normal & flood ping of these hosts show 0% packet lost from my both nodes.
>
> In the log below pingd - besides the warnings -
> states that the node is alive and that it had sent an update,
> but it does not show up in the cib.
>
> WR,
> Bruno
>
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On Sep 24, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
>>
>>
>>> There is a problem with attrd that affects pingd in Pacemeaker
>>> 0.7.3/Heartbeat 2.99. I've already created a Bugzilla ticket for it.
>>> You can add your information there:
>>>
>>> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1969
>>>
>> I'm not so sure this is the same thing.
>> Those "Bad echo" messages look suspicious
>>
>>
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:46 xen20a pingd: [13142]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo
>>>> (0):
>>>> 3, code=1, seq=0, id=0, check=24031
>>>>
>> In fact, type=3 is ICMP_DEST_UNREACH - so pingd really is having
>> trouble contacting that host.
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Bruno Voigt <Bruno.Voigt at ic3s.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I defined two ping clone resources,
>>>> to be used independently by different resources:
>>>>
>>>> <clone id="clone-pingd-internal">
>>>> <primitive id="pingd-internal" provider="pacemaker" class="ocf"
>>>> type="pingd">
>>>> <instance_attributes id="pingd-internal-ia">
>>>> <nvpair id="pingd-internal-ia01" name="name"
>>>> value="pingd-internal"/>
>>>> <nvpair id="pingd-internal-ia02" name="dampen" value="5s"/>
>>>> <nvpair id="pingd-internal-ia03" name="multiplier"
>>>> value="1000"/>
>>>> <nvpair id="pingd-internal-ia04" name="host_list"
>>>> value="172.17.32.23 192.168.132.23"/>
>>>> </instance_attributes>
>>>> </primitive>
>>>> </clone>
>>>>
>>>> <clone id="clone-pingd-external">
>>>> <primitive id="pingd-external" provider="pacemaker" class="ocf"
>>>> type="pingd">
>>>> <instance_attributes id="pingd-external-ia">
>>>> <nvpair id="pingd-external-ia01" name="name"
>>>> value="pingd-external"/>
>>>> <nvpair id="pingd-external-ia02" name="dampen" value="5s"/>
>>>> <nvpair id="pingd-external-ia03" name="multiplier"
>>>> value="1000"/>
>>>> <nvpair id="pingd-external-ia04" name="host_list"
>>>> value="195.244.97.241"/>
>>>> </instance_attributes>
>>>> </primitive>
>>>> </clone>
>>>>
>>>> I defined a constraint for a resource so that it depends on
>>>> pingd-internal
>>>>
>>>> <constraints>
>>>> <rsc_location id="hbtest1b-connectivity" rsc="hbtest1b">
>>>> <rule id="hbtest1b-connectivity-exclude-rule" score="-INFINITY" >
>>>> <expression id="hbtest1b-connectivity-exclude"
>>>> attribute="pingd-internal" operation="not_defined"/>
>>>> </rule>
>>>> </rsc_location>
>>>> </constraints>
>>>>
>>>> But this causes the resource to be unrunnable on either of my both
>>>> nodes,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are as expected 2 pingd daemons running:
>>>>
>>>> root 6132 1 0 21:07 ? 00:00:00
>>>> /usr/lib/heartbeat/pingd
>>>> -D -p /var/run/heartbeat/rsctmp/pingd-pingd-internal:0 -a
>>>> pingd-internal
>>>> -d 5s -m 1000 -h 172.17.32.23 -h 192.168.132.23
>>>> root 13142 1 0 21:47 ? 00:00:00
>>>> /usr/lib/heartbeat/pingd
>>>> -D -p /var/run/heartbeat/rsctmp/pingd-pingd-external:0 -a
>>>> pingd-external
>>>> -d 5s -m 1000 -h 195.244.97.241
>>>>
>>>> The problem is, I can't see in the cibadmin -Q output that the pingd
>>>> daemons have
>>>> have stored their results anywhere..
>>>>
>>>> In the log I see the following output:
>>>>
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:46 xen20a pingd: [13142]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo
>>>> (0):
>>>> 3, code=1, seq=0, id=0, check=24031
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:47 xen20a pingd: [13142]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo
>>>> (0):
>>>> 3, code=1, seq=0, id=0, check=24031
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:48 xen20a pingd: [13142]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo
>>>> (0):
>>>> 8, code=0, seq=261, id=0, check=22762
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:48 xen20a pingd: [6132]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo (0):
>>>> 8, code=0, seq=263, id=0, check=22250
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:50 xen20a pingd: [13142]: info: stand_alone_ping: Node
>>>> 195.244.97.241 is alive (1)
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:50 xen20a pingd: [13142]: info: send_update: 1 active ping
>>>> nodes
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:51 xen20a pingd: [6132]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo (0):
>>>> 3, code=1, seq=0, id=0, check=24031
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:52 xen20a pingd: [6132]: info: stand_alone_ping: Node
>>>> 172.17.32.23 is alive (3)
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:53 xen20a pingd: [6132]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo (0):
>>>> 3, code=1, seq=0, id=0, check=24031
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:54 xen20a pingd: [6132]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo (0):
>>>> 3, code=1, seq=0, id=0, check=25823
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:55 xen20a pingd: [6132]: WARN: dump_v4_echo: Bad echo (0):
>>>> 3, code=1, seq=0, id=0, check=24031
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:57 xen20a pingd: [6132]: info: stand_alone_ping: Node
>>>> 192.168.132.23 is alive (2)
>>>> Sep 24 22:01:57 xen20a pingd: [6132]: info: send_update: 2 active
>>>> ping nodes
>>>>
>>>> Where should the current pingd status be located in the cib ?
>>>> What is wrong with my setup ?
>>>>
>>>> TIA,
>>>> Bruno
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Serge Dubrouski.
>>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20080925/00e71d1d/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20080925/00e71d1d/attachment-0002.sig>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list