[Pacemaker] About "record-pending"

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Oct 30, 2008, at 7:13 AM, Yan Gao wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 18:22 +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:08 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Another issue is it doesn't trigger cib notify, hence mgmtd  
>>>> cannot be
>>>> aware of the event.
>>>
>>> Is the crm sending the update with the cib_inhibit_notify flag?
>>>
>> If it's LRM_OP_PENDING, it will always be set in:
>> te_actions.c:290
>> 		call_options |= cib_inhibit_notify; /* We don't want to
>> know about these updates */
> Andrew, clients could never get the notify because cib_inhibit_notify
> is always set here.

I'll fix that today.

> And the cib_scope_local is also set, so probably a
> pending operation would not be recorded in another node ?

No.  That flag just means perform the update locally - it doesn't mean  
the change wont be distributed.

>
>
>>
>> And should it be like the following at line 289 ?
>> -if(LRM_OP_PENDING) {
>> +if(status == LRM_OP_PENDING) {

that would make sense