[Pacemaker] Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [Cluster-devel] [RFC] Splitting cluster.git into separate projects/trees

[Fabio M. Di Nitto]

On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 11:25 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:02, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:52 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:52, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> >> > There is actually an important difference for me to keep them separated.
> >> >
> >> > Each time we do a package update, the whole set of daemons will need to
> >> > go through testing again, even if they didn't change a bit.
> >>
> >> True.
> >>
> >> Random thought - how about having the resource and fence agents together?
> >> Similar things with similar update frequencies...
> >
> > hmmm no.. same reason. they have different tasks.. different subsystems
> > etc.
> 
> They're still scripts though (and there's not much more difference
> between an IP and IPMI script than there is between an IP and Apache
> script).
> And I'd guess that the chances of each set needing a refresh is about
> the same at any given point in time...

You would still end up with the testing issue we try to avoid by keeping
daemons and agents separated.

Fabio