[Pacemaker] Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [Cluster-devel] [RFC] Splitting cluster.git into separate projects/trees

[Fabio M. Di Nitto]

On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:52 +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:52, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 15:57 -0600, David Teigland wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> > I'd have thought fence.git and fence-agents.git in one and cman.git
> >> > and rgmanager.git in another.
> >> > But I may be missing some of the interdependencies.
> >>
> >> I wouldn't mind either of those combinations.  Maybe rgmanager's last
> >> stand will be in cluster.git anyway... if so, then it's not a factor.
> >>
> >> I didn't have much reason for separating fence/fence-agents.  We're
> >> planning on unifying it all anyway, even if the agents are done sooner.
> >> And I don't think packaging/releasing agents separately should have much
> >> bearing on the source tree?  (I've heard interest in putting agents in
> >> their own package for Fedora.)
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >
> > There is actually an important difference for me to keep them separated.
> >
> > Each time we do a package update, the whole set of daemons will need to
> > go through testing again, even if they didn't change a bit.
> 
> True.
> 
> Random thought - how about having the resource and fence agents together?
> Similar things with similar update frequencies...

hmmm no.. same reason. they have different tasks.. different subsystems
etc.

Fabio