[Pacemaker] [RFC] Splitting cluster.git into separate projects/trees

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 13:05, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:06, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>>> Top-posting...
>>>>
>>>> #1 is what the current "situation" evolved from so I think its pretty
>>>> clear that despite the best of intentions, it doesn't work out (far
>>>> too easy for cross-dependancies to develop).
>>>>
>>>> #2 - I share chrissie's feelings on this one ;-)
>>>>
>>>> #3 - Thats got my vote - basically what we did with Pacemaker.
>>>>
>>>> The biggest question here is do you want old versions of the split out
>>>> code to be buildable?
>>>
>>> I am not 100% sure I understand what you mean..
>>
>> Perhaps an example from our split...
>>
>> The Pacemaker repo includes the _entire_ Heartbeat history up until the
>> split.
>> This allows me to build versions of the crm from before the split
>> (handy if you're doing "hg bisect" to track down which changeset broke
>> something).
>
> Oh yeah ,, that's the same thing I think I suggested.

Actually its the opposite :-)

> Maybe I didn't express
> myself properly but I want the full history for the sub project but not of
> unrelated stuff.
>
> So dlm.git will have the full dlm history up to HEAD/master. but it will not
> have cman history inside.

Thats basically what I did for the GUI.
Which is fine, it just means you wont be able to build pre-split
versions of the dlm from within dlm.git

>
> cluster.git will instead retain full history of everything up to the split.
>
> Fabio
>
> --
> I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at clusterlabs.org
> http://list.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>