[Linux-HA] Re: [Pacemaker] Ordered attribute of clone resources
Lars Marowsky-Bree
lmb at suse.de
Sat Jan 26 21:43:46 UTC 2008
On 2008-01-26T22:32:21, Andreas Mock <Andreas.Mock at web.de> wrote:
> this can have an impact on monitoring stonith resource agents if you
> want to use clones. There are many stonith devices which do allow only
> extactly one connection at a time. The monitor action is often implemented
> to connect to the stonith device to see if it's alive.
> Now if you use clones, and the stonith RA is run on more then one node
> it could happen that the monitor action is triggered at the same time
> resulting in one monitor action to fail because two instances try to connect
> to the same stonith device.
>
> Am I wrong with that conclusion?
No, you are not.
Such a device should either not be handled by a clone.
Or instead by an m/s resource - where only the master performs the
monitor; but this gives you maximum complexity while not providing any
benefit over handling it as a primitive resource - fancy, though ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list