<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 2 November 2010 12:58, Dejan Muhamedagic <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dejanmm@fastmail.fm">dejanmm@fastmail.fm</a>></span> wrote:</div><div class="gmail_quote">[...snip...]<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div class="h5"><br>
> Do you know under which conditions pacemaker initiates multiple connections<br>
> to a fencing device?<br>
<br>
</div></div>There are no specific conditions. It can happen by chance because<br>
individual clone instances run independently. </blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
> > The cloned resource will fence a node a bit faster in a case stonith<br>
> > > resource is running on the node to be fenced, there is no need to move<br>
> > the<br>
> > > resource to another node and then fence the node.<br>
> ><br>
> > Did you measure the time it takes to start the stonith resource?<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> The last time I tested it was with rackpdu and it took 5 secs for pacemaker<br>
> to move the resource and trigger the reboot event.<br>
<br>
</div>So, the time difference is 5 seconds in your case, right?<br>
<br><div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><div>No, this is the time it took to fence a node with non-cloned version.</div><div>I don't remember exactly how many secs it took with cloned version, but I do remember that it was faster.</div>
<div><br></div><div>When I get the new PDU (aviosys 9258) I will run the test again and get back on this.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Pavlos</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div></div>